Today's Hospitalist
Todays Hospitalist Home Current Issue Past Issues Blogs Jobs for Hospitalists Career Center Subscribe
Follow Us On Facebook Follow Us On Twitter Follow Us On Linkedin Meetings/CME  |   Email Alerts  |   Advertise  |   Reports
Hospitalist Career Center
Hospitalist Salary Survey
Hospitalist Career Tips
Hospitalist Practice Closeups
Hospitalist Job Search

Clinical protocols
Coding tips
Hospitalist Practice Management
Growing Your Hospitalist Practice
Guidance on Staffing and Scheduling
Handoffs and Discharge
Surgical Comanagement
Subscribe to Todays Hospitalist Magazine
Hospitalist Email Alerts
Contact Today's Hospitalist
Editorial Board
Privacy Policy

March 29, 2012
Too much specialization?

So I am patiently waiting for an MRI result, when they tell me the radiologist has left the building.

“What? I thought we had 24-hour radiology coverage?”

“Well, yeah, general radiology coverage. But I’m talking about the musculoskeletal radiologist. He leaves at 5 p.m.”

“Musculoskeletal radiologist? I didn’t even know such a thing existed! So a regular radiologist can’t read an MRI of the leg?”

“Nope. Call back in the morning.”

And with that, my LOS went from 0.5 to 0.7, making me lose about 1% of my productivity incentive. The whole episode got me thinking: What is going on with the growing trend toward ever-more specialized care?

I thought the whole purpose of specialization was to acquire the technical skills necessary to address complex medical problems. As such, training in subspecialties has grown exponentially as the care we provide has become more technically complex. But where does it end? At what point does subspecialization become … well, too specialized?

In the spirit of imagining future dystopias, here’s a list of potential sub-subspecialties. If you already have one of these or if you’ve heard of other sub-subspecialties, please respond in the comment section, along with your credit card number and social security number:

1. Distal phalanx hand surgeon: not to be confused with the knuckles surgeon, who actually trains in podiatry school, or the palm-of-the-hand surgeon, who is actually a dermatologist trained in palm reading.

2. Tween pediatrician: a subspecialty within adolescent medicine that specializes in Justin Bieber hysteria, PlayStation and Wii reflexes, and anti-bullying strategies.

3. Left-lung radiologist: not to be confused with the right-lung radiologist, the diaphragmatic radiologist (known as “diaphrad”) or the lingular radiologist (mistakenly referred to as the “linguist”). The latter is actually a subspecialty of ENT.

4. Islets of Langerhans gastroendocrinologist: an offshoot of Type-II diabetology, with a year of research in trying to figure out why there are so many things named after Langerhans (same for the research area of stressologists preoccupied with Cushing).

5. The dead-people pathologist: This one takes a holistic approach to deceased people. Not to be confused with the medical examiner, who is a physician who really wants to be a lawyer, or the skinny-slides pathologist, who is often at odds with the frozen-section pathologist (because stuff in the frozen section makes you fat … get it? ... OK, lame).

6. The cardiac-massage cardioelectropathophysiologist: This one takes your beating heart and squeezes it into submission, but only after you’ve had a heart transplant. If your heart stops before transplant … well, that’s when the dead-people pathologist intervenes.

7. And finally, the personalized medicine concierge doctor: An offshoot of the personalized medicine movement, the PMCMD knows where to get the best petit fours in the city, has a direct line to the best chef in town for all your social events, and can check—utilizing your own genomic material—if you’re allergic to the latest molecular cuisine dishes. If you break out in hives, he can even give you a subatomically dosed infusion of epinephrine, to avoid serious side effects to your vivacious telomeres.

And so on and so forth. Pretty soon we’ll have 1,000 board associations to certify this plethora of sub-subspecialists. By then, prices for board certification will be above $10,000 a pop and you will have to recertify every other year to keep up with the newer trends in medicine, like merry-go-round group psychiatry and inside-out gut devolution surgery.

This is great for the boards, which stand to make even more money that they can use to figure out a better way to screw doctors over in the name of “quality control." It's also good news for the economy, because the explosion of new procedures and diagnostic tests will certainly create an ever-ballooning deficit that will require floating the value of the dollar against the Malaysian ringgit. And selling Alaska to the Chinese.

But the best outcome of an expanding sub-subspecialist work force? The creation of new markets for medical publications.

Can you pass me the latest issue of “Today’s Meningoencephaloneurocardiovasculopathologist”?

Click here to add your comment

3 Comment(s)

Mohan Vupadhyayula wrote:
Great article. What we need is more hospitalists who can assess the patient as a whole and not as an organ system.
Fargo, ND | Thu, Apr 19 2012 10:46 AM

Paramjit Singh wrote:
A day is not far when we will have all superspecialists and no real doctor. They will have their share of the patients' money and the patient will continue to suffer. American medicine at work.
Lancaster, California | Fri, Apr 20 2012 18:03 PM

Diji Vaughan, MD wrote:
Are there any parallels here with "micromanagement"? - to borrow this often negatively viewed connotation from the business world.
Phoenix, AZ | Tue, May 8 2012 20:06 PM

What's value in health care?
Read Blog » (2)
Leaving clinical medicine
Read Blog » (7)
2012: the not-so-health(y) news
Read Blog »
Of donkeys and kings
Read Blog » (1)
Health care isn't cheesecake
Read Blog » (4)
Lessons learned
Read Blog »
Too much specialization?
Read Blog » (3)
Hurry up and wait
Read Blog »
The "patient experience": Is it patient pandering?
Read Blog » (5)
Occupy Health Care!
Read Blog » (3)
The robot is in
Read Blog »
The Resident (with apologies to Edgar Allan Poe)
Read Blog » (6)
The best patient satisfaction survey ever!
Read Blog »
ACOs and the "medical home"
Read Blog »
My perfect hospital
Read Blog » (5)
Do hospitals need more outsiders?
Read Blog »
Is the physical exam necessary?
Read Blog » (5)
Mentoring 101
Read Blog » (5)
Learning lean
Read Blog »
Setting discharge goals
Read Blog » (1)
When do children become adults?
Read Blog »
In memory of E.N.
Read Blog »
2009: Changing jobs, and the other side of the stethoscope
Read Blog »
Short honeymoon
Read Blog »
Time for hospitalists to act
Read Blog »
Getting a seat at the reform table
Read Blog » (4)
Health care reform: the Sermo survey
Read Blog »
Business as usual: the AMA's opposition
Read Blog » (3)
Dear Mr. President
Read Blog »
Friend me?
Read Blog »
The new "universal physician"
Read Blog »
Read Blog »
Can't get no satisfaction?
Read Blog »
Bells and whistles
Read Blog »
This week's ranking
Read Blog »
The newest new thing
Read Blog » (3)
The wolf at the door
Read Blog »
A case of medical deja vu
Read Blog » (1)
Beeper blues
Read Blog » (1)
Children are not small adults ... except when they are
Read Blog » (4)

About Ruben J. Nazario, MD
Ruben J. Nazario, MD, is now medical director at Inovalon, a health care data analytics company, and is medical editor for Elsevier's First Consult. A pediatric hospitalist, Dr. Nazario is a veteran of both community and academic pediatric hospitalist programs. All material represents his own views and does not reflect the views of his employer.
Add your comments...
Click here to add your comment
Copyright © 2014 Today's Hospitalist. All rights reserved.
Home   |   Current Issue   |   Past Issues   |   Blogs   |   Jobs   |   Career Center   |   Subscribe   |  
Search   |   CME   |   E-mail Alerts   |   Advertise