Today's Hospitalist
 
Todays Hospitalist Home Current Issue Past Issues Blogs Jobs for Hospitalists Career Center Subscribe
CME  |   Email Alerts  |   Advertise
Hospitalist Career Center
Hospitalist Salary Survey
Hospitalist Career Tips
Hospitalist Practice Closeups
Hospitalist Job Search

Clinical protocols
Coding tips
Hospitalist Practice Management
Growing Your Hospitalist Practice
Guidance on Staffing and Scheduling
Handoffs and Discharge
Surgical Comanagement
Subscribe to Todays Hospitalist Magazine
Hospitalist Email Alerts
Contact Today's Hospitalist
Editorial Board
Management
Privacy Policy


December 31, 2009
Cheer up, you could have been a lawyer!

Cheer up? Traditionally, prime bragging rights for parents have included daughters or sons who grew up to be doctors, lawyers or engineers. While I suspect your parents will still love you no matter what career you choose, they may love you a little more now if you became a doctor—especially if you became a lawyer and now are living back home.

Lawyers are hurting. Or should I say, on behalf of all of my colleagues who, like me, have been involved in absurd malpractice claims: Lawyers are hurting, hooray! It turns out that many attorneys, even the ones graduating from top-flight law schools like Harvard, Yale and Stanford, can’t find a job. Traditionally, graduates of these schools would be coming out of training staring at offers that would make a resident lightheaded, and perhaps even cause a primary care physician to be envious. On top of that, many established attorneys have been laid off or are underemployed. In fact, the entire industry has been shaken as even their payment standard—the billable hour—has come under pressure.

Cause for celebration? Perhaps, but lawyers' misery may present a cautionary note for our own profession, especially when we consider how much debt these young lawyers have accumulated. An old college friend, Jonathan Glater at the New York Times, wrote about the curious case of the attorney who paradoxically could not get a license because of his law school debt burden. Jonathan noted that, "New York’s courts have overlooked misconduct like lawyers’ solicitation of minors for sex, efforts to deceive judges and possession of cocaine. Those instances have led merely to temporary suspensions from practice."

However, the New York state appellate judges decided not to ignore the fact that this lawyer's student loans were over $400,000. They denied him membership to the state bar because they believed such a level of indebtedness implied that, "Applicant has not presently established the character and general fitness requisite for an attorney and counselor-at-law."

Could this happen to a doctor? Clearly, medical education debt is out of control, with the average debt currently running $154,607 upon graduation from residency. Given that most doctors need between three and seven years to even start paying back their loans, it appears the average doctor is halfway to our friend the lawyer’s plight when they make their first repayment.

If we are to believe debtdoctor.net, a doctor "cannot be denied your license because of filing [bankruptcy]." I'm not sure if I am more relieved to read this or more terrified to know there is a Web site with that title. And because bankruptcy could be reportable on a medical staff application, it is at least possible that physicians would be denied hospital privileges if they were mired in legal limbo due to financial problems.

Massive school loans have affected the employment landscape of lawyers; the analogy to our own field is the much higher salaries paid to subspecialists. There is a national shortage of public defenders, which reminds me of the scarcity of primary care physicians. Faced with lower salaries, which are under even more pressure due to the fact that the recession has left state budgets in crisis, most lawyers saddled with heavy debt cannot consider working in such a field. This has led directly to decreased access to legal care for the indigent.

Back to the billable hour, which is the only professional reimbursement system under more assault than our fee-for-service model. Both suffer from the perception, warranted I believe, that they create perverse payment incentives summed up as "Paid more for doing more."

For lawyers at least, the depressed economy is no longer able to pay for such inefficiencies. Cash-strapped companies are looking to more affordable solutions to their legal needs, and lawyers are now being forced to work on a contingency basis or for a set predetermined fee.

Perhaps a bit of a stretch, but set attorney fees may foreshadow the almost certain trend to bundle physicians' professional fees. (As an aside, I doubt physicians will be practicing in a contingency-based world any time soon but it is still a fun exercise to imagine what that would look like: "If I cure you Mrs. Smith, I will take 40% of your Medicare and Social Security loot; if you die, I get nothing. Fair enough?")

So what is the upshot? At a minimum, it is at least an interesting observation if not an ominous warning for physicians if they believe the status quo will not change. And no matter what career you choose, assuming you aren’t already a hospitalist, I trust your mom will be proud of you. However, cautionary tales aside, it is clear that if you become a hospitalist, your mom will be apt to love you a bit more than your other siblings, as is the case with my mother. (Full disclosure, my brother is a practicing attorney in Seattle, and I am, needless to say, a hospitalist).




Click here to add your comment

CHECK OUT RECENT POSTS
Enough already?
Read Blog »
Dear Dr. Berwick
Read Blog »
Suing hospitalists
Read Blog »
Another one bites the dust
Read Blog » (2)
The top 95%
Read Blog » (2)
My growing list of initials
Read Blog » (1)
Certification: not tough enough?
Read Blog »
Weighing in on l'affaire Levy
Read Blog »
Fallout from Arora
Read Blog »
Where's the beef?
Read Blog » (1)
The best of times?
Read Blog » (2)
Big Brother medicine
Read Blog » (2)
"Wallflowers at the dance"
Read Blog »
Drowning in cognitive scut?
Read Blog »
Welcome to New Jersey—again
Read Blog »
A word from our sponsor ...
Read Blog »
"Saddle up": SHM 2010
Read Blog » (2)
"You might be a hospitalist ... "
Read Blog »
From Russia with love
Read Blog »
Time to waste
Read Blog »
Finding the elusive Dr. X
Read Blog »
"Known to you"
Read Blog » (2)
2020 vision
Read Blog » (2)
The death of the doctors' lounge
Read Blog » (2)
Righting all of hospitals' wrongs
Read Blog » (2)
Reconsidering patients who go AMA
Read Blog »
"Drop your highlighters!"
Read Blog » (3)
Cheer up, you could have been a lawyer!
Read Blog »
Getting down with OPPE
Read Blog »
Hospitalists and patient satisfaction: Another value-added metric?
Read Blog »
Dodging a frivolous lawsuit
Read Blog » (1)
"We’ve come a long way, baby!"
Read Blog »
Hospital medicine: Too big to fail?
Read Blog »
Dear subspecialty fellowship directors
Read Blog »
Hospitalists: secret agents of cost control?
Read Blog »
My two cents on health care reform
Read Blog » (2)
The right to bare arms
Read Blog »
Treating the whole hospital
Read Blog »
The reform solution: Cash for Clunkers
Read Blog »
A walk in my best friend's shoes
Read Blog » (2)
Throwing good money after bad (Doc Scream 2)
Read Blog » (1)
Square dance
Read Blog »
Big game hunting
Read Blog » (2)
Casino billboards and hospital medicine
Read Blog »
Wall Street, lawyers and doctors
Read Blog »
Big game hunting
Read Blog »
Bouncebacks: the new LOS
Read Blog » (2)
Is it cold-turkey time for the free lunch?
Read Blog »
SHM 2009: “Something is going to happen.”
Read Blog »
My professional midlife crisis
Read Blog »
RoboHospitalist: the battle begins
Read Blog »
ACP: the kinship report
Read Blog »
Top hospitalists?
Read Blog » (1)
Poor communication=unrealistic expectations
Read Blog »
A lottery for patient compliance?
Read Blog »
Fellowship and certification: What's in a name?
Read Blog » (4)
The common-sense evidence behind RRTs
Read Blog » (2)
Certification controversy, Part 2
Read Blog » (3)
Do we make too much money? Version 2.0
Read Blog »
The certification controversy
Read Blog » (7)
Mr. President: hospitalists and health care costs
Read Blog »
Rationing: coming to a hospital near you!
Read Blog » (2)
hos-pit-tal-ism: Should we claim the word for our own?
Read Blog »
"And this year's Hospy goes to ..."
Read Blog »
The truth behind the team cliches
Read Blog »
Procedures: Are we the go-to doctors of the future?
Read Blog » (2)
A timeless classic comes to an end
Read Blog » (2)
Happy Birthday to us
Read Blog » (1)
Erik the Doctor
Read Blog » (3)
A vast hospitalist conspiracy?
Read Blog »
Brand-name shoppers
Read Blog » (2)
“Strive for five”—not just for the food pyramid anymore
Read Blog » (2)
Internal medicine as contact sport
Read Blog »
Welcome to my world
Read Blog » (6)
Trying to beat the competition
Read Blog » (2)
A marriage proposal: hospital medicine and critical care
Read Blog » (1)
“You don’t need a weatherman ... "
Read Blog » (4)
Recruiting: Should we bring it in-house?
Read Blog » (1)
Hospital medicine: the new minor leagues?
Read Blog »
Welcome to New Jersey!
Read Blog » (7)
What to wear?
Read Blog » (4)
Mastering the art of the sign-out
Read Blog » (3)
Another slice of internal medicine: comprehensivist?
Read Blog » (4)
The five stages of hospital medicine
Read Blog » (2)
Co-management: too much of a good thing?
Read Blog » (1)
Shock first, ask later
Read Blog » (2)
MD, MBA
Read Blog »
Night shifts: great for programs, hazardous to your health?
Read Blog » (3)
24/7, shift work and vacation time
Read Blog » (6)
Do we make too much money?
Read Blog » (7)
"House doctors" and/or hospitalists?
Read Blog » (7)
An introduction
Read Blog » (4)

About Erik DeLue, MD
Erik DeLue, MD, examines the challenges of running and reinventing a hospitalist program. He is medical director of the hospitalist program at Virtua Memorial, a hospital in Mt. Holly, N.J.

This is the third community hospital program that Dr. DeLue has worked for in his nine years as a hospitalist. Join in the dialogue on issues that range from compensation and 24/7 scheduling to how to work with competing hospitalist groups.

The opinions expressed by Dr. DeLue are his own and do not necessary reflect the opinions of his employer or Today's Hospitalist.
Add your comments...
Click here to add your comment
Copyright © 2009 Today's Hospitalist. All rights reserved.
Home   |   Current Issue   |   Past Issues   |   Blogs   |   Jobs   |   Career Center   |   Subscribe   |  
Search   |   CME   |   E-mail Alerts   |   Advertise